Stanley Crouch: "Chief of Scouts"

This is Mr. Stanley Crouch:

I just finished reading his recent "Opinion" article titled "Wake Up and Smell the Thuggery".

It brought to my mind the movie, "Geronimo", starring Wes Studi in the title role. In this movie, the U.S. Army was depicted as going to war with the Apache People for conquest of their lands, and enlisted the help of some poor, misguided Apaches, as "scouts" and "trackers", to help the army invaders track down and "neutralize" the so-called "hostile" Indians.

There was one scout, in particular, who was of the same tribe as Geronimo; who, bless his heart, really thought he was acting in the best interest of his people by helping the invaders and oppressors of his people.

Long story short, this scout, "Chato", was very proud of his position in the white man's army, and thought that by helping the white man, he would secure some benefit for himself and for his family. That is, until they actually caught up with Geronimo.

Upon Geronimo's surrender, the white man had no more use for Chato and the other scouts, and so arrested them -- despite their loyal service to the invaders -- and exiled them to distant reservations along with Geronimo and the rest of the "hostiles".

It was at this moment when Chato realized he had been deceived by his "employers", and was actually being used "against" his people, while being made to believe he was "helping" his people.

In the last scene, Chato had to face the disgust of his brethren, whom he betrayed, and who no longer trusted him for his demonstration of disloyalty in siding with the enemies of his people.

Why am I recalling this? Well, if it isn't obvious by now, it is to set the context for a question or two I'd like to ask regarding Mr. Crouch.

For whom does he really speak? Does he speak for [the interests of] Black People? Or does he speak for [the interests of] White People?

What does he think his white "employers" will do with him, when they have no more need for his services?

As his people become more aware and more dissatisfied with the socio-political climate in this country, and he continues to speak from the platform of the enemies and oppressors of his people, how will he face them when his "employers" cut him loose, and leave him to face the people whose interests he has betrayed?

His apparent disdain for the Nation of Islam and the Hon. Louis Farrakhan is of little consequence, in truth; as he has not the power to stop him from what God has Appointed him to do; so I am not really concerned about that. But I am concerned about him (Mr. Crouch), and the people he infects with his bias.

This article was just more confirmation for me that "intellect" and "responsibility" don't necessarily go hand-in-hand.

Shame.

RM

"Had We wished to take a pastime..."

In the Name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful...the Best Knower.


Allah says, in the Holy Qur'an, Surah 21:
16 And We created not the heaven and the earth and what is between them for sport.
17 Had We wished to take a pastime, We would have taken it from before Ourselves; by no means would We do (so).
18 Nay, We hurl the Truth against falsehood, so it knocks out its brains, and lo! it vanishes. And woe to you for what you describe!

I was reflecting on this passage the other day, when something occurred to me, "What does that word 'pastime' mean?"

Basically, it means 'anything one does to pass the time'. It is time spent without assuming the responsibilities of progress.

So, I thought about the way that verse is worded:
"Had We wished to take a pastime, We would have taken it from before Ourselves; by no means would We do (so)."

In other words,
"...if there were something that had existed before Us, then we could take that as a pastime; but because We are before everything, and are thus the Makers and the Owners of everything, then We are also RESPONSIBLE for the order and wellbeing of everything. Our pastime is the maintenance of the Order and Purpose of the Heavens and the Earth. And since the Universe is Created with Truth, then Falsehood interferes with the Maintenance of the Universe. Therefore, We who are Responsible for the Maintenance of the Universe must be ever on the look-out for Falsehood, and if discovered, We must hurl the Truth at that Falsehood to preserve the Order and Wellbeing of that which We are Responsible for."

Then it occurred to me that, as individuals, we could consider that there is plenty that was here "before ourselves", and therefore plenty of time for a pass-time; but the closer we get to the Mind of God (by His Permission), with that closeness comes an increased level of responsibility for the order and wellbeing of our environment (which ultimately is the Universe and everything in it).

The Question is: "Do we WANT that Responsibility?"

Just something to ponder.

Four Birds

In the Name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful...the Best Knower.

I bear witness that there is no god but Allah,
And I bear witness that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah.

As I was doing my daily reading the other day, I came across a verse in the Holy Qur'an that reminded me of the spirit and purpose of the Nation of Islam and the Atonement Commmission; and it has been on my mind since then. So I thought I should share it with my family.

2:260
And when Abraham said, "My Lord, show me how You give life to the dead." [Allah] said, "Do you not believe?" [Abraham] said, "Yes, but that my heart may be at ease." [Allah] said, "Then take four birds, then tame them to incline to you, then place on every mountain a part of them, then call them. They will come to you flying; and know that Allah is Mighty, Wise.

Here, Abraham is asking how Allah gives life to the "dead". Apparently, he is troubled in his heart over his lack of understanding just "how" Allah gives life to the dead. Why would Abraham have such a concern?

We, too, could ask the question of Allah and of ourselves, "How do you, Allah, give life to the Dead?".

I find it very interesting that Allah's answer and instruction involved the use of "birds" as a model of "the dead", and I began to ask myself the question, "Why use BIRDS as an example of how to raise the DEAD? What is the connection?"

The HOnorable Louis Farrakhan has taught us that a "bird" is a very delicate creature and is very sensitive and humble. As such, one must take great care in handling a bird so as to prevent traumatizing it, whether physically or mentally, or scaring it away.

So, Allah says to Abraham: "...take four birds, then tame them to incline to you..."

This suggests to me that the birds were not "inclined" to him when he "took" them. So, how was he able to "take" them? How did he approach them so that he could "take" them without harming them or scaring them off? Did he approach them in a harsh or careless manner? Did he approach them with loud noise and a great "show" of power? Or, did he approach them quietly and carefully, with great respect for the sensitivities of the birds?

What does it mean to "tame"? What does it mean to "incline" to someone or something? And HOW did Abraham "tame them to incline" to him?

One of the definitions of "tame" is "to reduce from a wild to a domestic state; to subject to cultivation." To "cultivate" means to nurture the life or the existence of something, so that it may become fully what it is destined to be.

To "incline" means "to lean toward", or "to lean, tend, or become drawn toward an opinion or course of conduct."

So then, Abraham was instructed by Allah to "tame them to incline" to him, or, make them willing to lean toward him for cultivation and sustenance.

How could he accomplish this except by meeting the Natural Needs of the Birds? HE would have to meet their need for Security (Peace) and all that goes toward makeing them Secure. He could not have been successful if he had handled the "birds" in the same way one would handle an elephant or a dog, etc. He had to understand something of the Nature and Needs of the Birds in order to approach them in a way that would not repel them.
(see also H.Q. 3:158)

So, what does this have to do with "giving life to the dead"? And who ARE "the dead"?

Does "the dead" refer only to our people in the street? Or, could "the dead" also refer to our families? Could it refer to the atmosphere in a Mosque? Could it refer to the whole human family?

If you or I were in Abraham's shoes, how would we go about accomplishing Allah's instruction to "tame them to incline to you"?

After Abraham was successful in taming the birds to incline to him ("After learning Mathematics..."), he then could call them, and they would naturally come to him "flying" because he demonstrated the ability to suffice their legitimate needs.

What are we to learn from this?

May Allah Forgive us our sins and continue to Bless, Guide and Keep us all.

RM

Judge Not, Lest Ye Be Judged...

In the Name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful...the Best Knower.

Something I was pondering this morning:

We must be slow to judge, and be careful HOW we judge, for all of us are part of an ever-changing, ever-evolving reality; and none of us are exactly the same, today, as we were yesterday.

If I "label" someone based upon my own limited experience and insight, then, in my mind, I am not allowing him or her the freedom to grow into that which Allah Created him or her to be.

In reality, if we, in our minds, hold someone to a particular moment in time; it is not they who are held captive in that moment, but it is we who are held in that moment in the past, and so become disconnected (to some degree) from the present.

In other words, we cannot hold someone captive in a certain moment in the past without holding ourselves captive in that same moment.

"Judge not, lest ye be judged..."

RM

UFO over HAITI ???

In the Name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful...the Best Knower.

Below is alleged footage of a "UFO" filmed over Haiti on August 6, 2007.

While many people are assuming that it is a hoax, I must say that I have watched this video several times and could not find any significant indicators of fraud.

Also, all of the "debunkers" of this footage that I have read, focus solely on the immediate surroundings of the two "UFOs": The UFOs themselves, and the trees beneath them. However, I have yet to read one statement of criticism which focuses or even addresses the movements of the OTHER lights in the sky which are clearly visible and define highly unusual flight paths.

I cannot say, for certain, that this is NOT a hoax, because I was not there to witness it. However, I am more inclined to accept this footage as authentic than any other footage I have seen.

You be the judge.



RM